Skip to content
BHP

Pentosan Polysulfate

PPS · PPS sodium · Elmiron · Cartrophen · SP54

Reviewed by the BestHealingPeptides Editorial Team ·

On this page

A semi-synthetic sulfated polysaccharide (not a peptide). Oral pentosan polysulfate sodium (Elmiron) is FDA-approved for bladder pain associated with interstitial cystitis, and injectable forms are being studied in knee osteoarthritis. Its label carries a warning for pigmentary maculopathy with long-term use.

Mechanism of action

Pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) is a semi-synthetic drug manufactured from beech-wood hemicellulose by sulfate esterification of the xylopyranose hydroxyl groups (Kumagai et al., BMC Clin Pharmacol 2010). The FDA label for oral Elmiron describes it as a semi-synthetically produced heparin-like macromolecular carbohydrate derivative with a molecular weight of 4000 to 6000 Dalton, and as a low molecular weight heparin-like compound with anticoagulant and fibrinolytic effects. It is a polysaccharide, not a peptide. Joint research. In vitro, calcium PPS directly inhibited the aggrecanase activity of ADAMTS4 in interleukin-1alpha-stimulated osteoarthritic chondrocytes; the authors note that aggrecanases are considered to play key roles in aggrecan degradation in osteoarthritic cartilage and suggest that calcium PPS could function as a chondroprotective agent (Takizawa et al., FEBS Lett 2008, PMID 18671975). That is cell-culture evidence. The human knee osteoarthritis studies summarised below are small and report symptoms, function or biomarkers, so whether this enzyme-inhibition mechanism accounts for any clinical effect has not been established here. Bladder. The FDA label states that the mechanism by which PPS achieves its effects in patients is unknown; in preliminary clinical models it adhered to the bladder wall mucosal membrane, and the label says it may act as a buffer that controls cell permeability and keeps irritating solutes in the urine from reaching the cells. A controlled trial (Parsons et al., J Urol 1993) concluded that its results support the concept that some patients with the interstitial cystitis syndrome may have abnormal bladder surface glycosaminoglycans. Both statements are hypotheses rather than an established mechanism. Anticoagulant activity. The FDA label calls Elmiron a weak anticoagulant (1/15 the activity of heparin). At a daily dose of 300 mg (n=128), rectal haemorrhage was reported as an adverse event in 6.3% of patients, and bleeding complications of ecchymosis, epistaxis and gum haemorrhage have been reported. The label advises evaluating patients with signs or symptoms of an underlying coagulopathy or other increased bleeding risk, and caution in patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Pigmentary maculopathy. Pearce and colleagues (Ophthalmology 2018) described six adults with interstitial cystitis, all treated with PPS, who had a novel pigmentary maculopathy; median cumulative exposure was 2263 g (range 1314-2774 g) over a median of 186 months. They reported that multimodal imaging and functional studies were suggestive of a primary retinal pigment epithelium injury and that additional investigation was warranted to explore causality. The FDA label states that the aetiology is unclear and that cumulative dose appears to be a risk factor.

Pearce and colleagues (Ophthalmology 2018) described six adults with interstitial cystitis and long-term PPS exposure (median cumulative 2263 g) who had a novel pigmentary maculopathy. Later UCLA screening studies found it in 16% to 20% of PPS users who were screened, the FDA label now carries a warning, and the MHRA has advised regular ophthalmic examinations. A 2026 case series (Fung et al., JAMA Ophthalmol) reported the maculopathy after subcutaneous PPS alone in three patients at cumulative doses of 45.5 to 96 g.

— Notable finding

Research history

PPS has been used in both human and veterinary medicine. A 2003 review of suspected adverse reactions to Cartrophen Vet (100 mg sodium pentosan polysulphate per ml) reported to the UK Veterinary Medicines Directorate in dogs between January 1991 and October 1999 covered 161 reports (Hannon et al., J Small Anim Pract 2003, PMID 12779171), so the product was in veterinary use in the UK during that period. Human knee osteoarthritis work with injectable PPS is more recent and mostly small. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study enrolled 114 patients who received sodium PPS 3 mg/kg or Ringer's solution intramuscularly once a week for 4 weeks (Ghosh et al., Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2005). A single-centre, open-label trial gave 20 patients 6 weekly subcutaneous injections of 2 mg/kg (Kumagai et al., BMC Clin Pharmacol 2010). A 2026 exploratory phase 2 randomised trial of subcutaneous PPS in 61 participants, whose authors include employees of the sponsor Paradigm Biopharmaceuticals, reported effects on synovial fluid biomarkers (Skerrett et al., Arthritis Res Ther 2026). A larger phase 2/3 trial of subcutaneous PPS in knee osteoarthritis pain (NCT04809376, 602 participants) is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov as active, not recruiting (record last updated 8 April 2024); we did not find a peer-reviewed publication of its results when searching PubMed on 15 October 2026. In the United States, Drugs@FDA lists the original approval of Elmiron (NDA 020193) on 26 September 1996; the label indication is the relief of bladder pain or discomfort associated with interstitial cystitis. The retinal signal emerged later. Pearce and colleagues published a six-patient case series of a novel pigmentary maculopathy in Ophthalmology in 2018. The MHRA published a Drug Safety Update on the risk in September 2019 after a letter to healthcare professionals in July 2019, and the FDA label revised in June 2020 carries a Warnings entry for retinal pigmentary changes. In December 2021 the MHRA added a note that the Summary of Product Characteristics recommends an ophthalmologic examination after 6 months of use and, if there are no pathologic findings, regularly after 5 years of use or earlier in case of visual complaints.

Summarised studies

Summarised research studies
YearModelOutcomeCitationSource
2018Retrospective case series; six adults with interstitial cystitis treated with PPS, evaluated by a single clinician between May 2015 and October 2017Median cumulative PPS exposure was 2263 g (range 1314-2774 g) over a median 186 months. Most patients (4 of 6) reported difficulty reading as the most bothersome symptom. Nearly all eyes showed subtle paracentral hyperpigmentation at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium with a surrounding array of vitelliform-like deposits; the authors described a novel and possibly avoidable maculopathy and called for further investigation of causality.Pearce W.A., Chen R., Jain N., Ophthalmology 2018;125(11):1793-1802PMID 29801663
2021Prospective cohort; of 741 patients prescribed PPS in a university database, 100 (13.4%) agreed to take part in multimodal retinal imaging screeningThe prevalence of PPS maculopathy was 16%. The affected group had a greater mean duration of therapy, mean daily dosage and mean cumulative dosage (19.5 years, 433.9 mg, 3,103.1 g) than the unaffected group (7.1 years, 291.6 mg, 768.4 g). The authors concluded the prevalence was 15%-20% among PPS users who agreed to participate.Wang D. et al., Am J Ophthalmol 2021;227:125-138PMID 33651989
2020Cross-sectional study; patients previously or currently treated with PPS at UCLA were randomly ascertained and screened with multimodal retinal imagingPrevalence of PPS-associated maculopathy was 20% (10/50). Mean duration and cumulative dosage were 6.3 years and 691.7 g in the unaffected group versus 20.3 years and 3375.4 g in the affected group (p < 0.001). The authors recommended baseline examination with OCT, near-infrared reflectance and fundus autofluorescence, then annual imaging especially with cumulative dosages approaching 500 g, and stated that patients exposed to more than 1500 g are at significant risk.Wang D. et al., Can J Ophthalmol 2020;55(2):116-125PMID 31973791
2026Multi-institutional retrospective case series; patients with pentosan polysulfate maculopathy after subcutaneous PPS for osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis, at 3 centres (Miami, Los Angeles, Sydney)Cumulative doses were very low in all 3 cases, ranging from 45.5 to 96 g over 7 to 10 years, and the multimodal imaging features were classic for PPS retinal toxicity. The authors suggest PPS retinal toxicity can occur with subcutaneous administration alone, at much lower doses than typically occurs with oral administration, and advise caution when using subcutaneous PPS given progression even after cessation.Fung A.T. et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2026;144(2):185-191PMID 41379439
2020Retrospective case series; patients with PPS-associated maculopathy and at least 6 months of follow-up after drug cessation (two US centres)No eyes exhibited a demonstrable improvement after discontinuing PPS; 9 of 11 patients (82%) reported worsening visual symptoms at the final visit, and 17 eyes (77%) showed expansion of the involved area. The authors suggest that the maculopathy continues to evolve after cessation for at least 10 years.Shah R. et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2020;138(8):894-900PMID 32644147
1993Randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at 7 clinical centres; oral PPS 100 mg three times per day or placebo32% of patients on PPS showed significant improvement compared with 16% on placebo (p = 0.01). PPS patients also had a significant decrease in pain and urgency on analogue scales (p = 0.04 and 0.01) and more showed an average increase of more than 20 ml in voided volume (p = 0.02). All adverse effects were minor, with 7 in the drug group and 10 in the placebo group.Parsons C.L., Benson G., Childs S.J., Hanno P., Sant G.R., Webster G., J Urol 1993;150(3):845-848PMID 7688432
2005Randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicentre 32-week study of PPS 300, 600 and 900 mg per dayMean ICSI scores improved significantly in all three dose groups (P < 0.001) but the response was not dose dependent. At 32 weeks, 49.6%, 49.6% and 45.2% of patients were responders at 300, 600 and 900 mg respectively. Most adverse events were mild and resolved without intervention. The FDA label reports that at 900 mg daily, a dose higher than the approved dose, rectal haemorrhage was reported in 15% of patients in the 380-patient study, and that in a separate 16-week phase 2 study in 100 men (51 PPS, 49 placebo) elevated liver function tests were reported as an adverse event in 11.8% (n=6) of PPS-treated patients versus 2% (n=1) on placebo.Nickel J.C. et al., Urology 2005;65(4):654-658PMID 15833501
2005Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study in adults with knee OA; sodium PPS 3 mg/kg or Ringer's solution (control) intramuscularly once weekly for 4 weeks; follow-up to 24 weeksSignificant differences were found in 3 of 7 direct clinical assessments: duration of joint stiffness (weeks 4, 8, 12, 16), pain at rest (weeks 8, 12, 16, 24) and patient global assessment (weeks 4-24). Functional improvement from baseline was found at weeks 8 and 12 in the PPS group (P = 0.02). Mild bruising at the injection site occurred in fewer than 1% of patients in both groups.Ghosh P., Edelman J., March L., Smith M., Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2005;66(6):552-571PMID 24678076
2010Single-centre, open-label trial in patients with mild radiographic knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1 to 3); 6 weekly subcutaneous injections of PPS 2 mg/kg; assessed to 52 weeksHydrarthroses were reduced quickly in all cases. Clinical assessments including knee flexion and pain while walking or climbing stairs improved significantly, and these improvements continued for almost one year. The dose affected the blood coagulation test but was within safe levels; slightly abnormal findings were noted in serum triglycerides.Kumagai K. et al., BMC Clin Pharmacol 2010;10:7PMID 20346179
2026Exploratory phase 2, randomised 1:1:1, double-blind trial; subcutaneous injectable PPS twice weekly, once weekly or placebo for 39 days with 365-day follow-up (ACTRN12621000136808)The primary endpoint was change from baseline in synovial fluid biomarkers at Day 56. Versus placebo, the cartilage marker ARGS decreased by 56.60% (p = 0.028) while COMP decreased by 23.60% (confidence interval spanning zero). Serum CTX-I increased by 35.74% (p = 0.022) at Day 56 and by 65.52% (p = 0.025) at Day 168 versus placebo. iPPS was well tolerated with no serious related adverse events or adverse events of special interest.Skerrett D.L. et al., Arthritis Res Ther 2026;28(1):73PMID 41588475
2008In vitro; interleukin-1alpha-stimulated osteoarthritic chondrocytes and ADAMTS4 binding experiments with synthetic peptidesCalcium PPS directly inhibited the aggrecanase activity of ADAMTS4 without affecting the mRNA expression of the ADAMTS species. The authors suggest calcium PPS could function as a chondroprotective agent by inhibiting ADAMTS4 through interaction with its C-terminal ancillary domain.Takizawa M. et al., FEBS Lett 2008;582(19):2945-2949PMID 18671975

Pigmentary Maculopathy Associated with Chronic Exposure to Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium

Pearce W.A., Chen R., Jain N., Ophthalmology 2018;125(11):1793-1802 · 2018 · PMID 29801663

The case series that first described pigmentary maculopathy in chronic PPS users. It is small and retrospective and cannot give a risk rate; later screening cohorts are listed below.

PubMed

Pentosan Polysulfate Maculopathy: Prevalence, Spectrum of Disease, and Choroidal Imaging Analysis Based on Prospective Screening

Wang D. et al., Am J Ophthalmol 2021;227:125-138 · 2021 · PMID 33651989

Single-centre screening of volunteers. It supports a dose-related association but, because participation was voluntary, the prevalence figure should not be generalised to all PPS users.

PubMed

Pentosan-associated maculopathy: prevalence, screening guidelines, and spectrum of findings based on prospective multimodal analysis

Wang D. et al., Can J Ophthalmol 2020;55(2):116-125 · 2020 · PMID 31973791

Source of the 500 g and 1500 g cumulative-dose figures quoted on this page. These are the authors' screening recommendations from one centre, not regulatory thresholds, and they come from oral users rather than from subcutaneous use (see Fung 2026).

PubMed

Pentosan Polysulfate Maculopathy Following Subcutaneous Injections for Arthritis

Fung A.T. et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2026;144(2):185-191 · 2026 · PMID 41379439

Very small case series, so it cannot give a rate, but it is the main published signal that the subcutaneous route used in the knee osteoarthritis trials can also be associated with the maculopathy. Retinal toxicity had primarily been reported with oral use before it.

PubMed

Disease Course in Patients With Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium-Associated Maculopathy After Drug Cessation

Shah R. et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2020;138(8):894-900 · 2020 · PMID 32644147

Small retrospective series indicating that stopping PPS did not reverse the retinal changes in these patients.

PubMed

A quantitatively controlled method to study prospectively interstitial cystitis and demonstrate the efficacy of pentosanpolysulfate

Parsons C.L., Benson G., Childs S.J., Hanno P., Sant G.R., Webster G., J Urol 1993;150(3):845-848 · 1993 · PMID 7688432

Controlled trial of oral PPS in interstitial cystitis showing a modest benefit over placebo. The abstract does not state the treatment duration.

PubMed

Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of pentosan polysulfate sodium for interstitial cystitis

Nickel J.C. et al., Urology 2005;65(4):654-658 · 2005 · PMID 15833501

Dose-ranging study with no placebo arm: higher doses were no better than the current recommended dose of 300 mg per day, and the authors judged duration of therapy to matter more than dose.

PubMed

Effects of pentosan polysulfate in osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

Ghosh P., Edelman J., March L., Smith M., Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2005;66(6):552-571 · 2005 · PMID 24678076

A pilot study using the intramuscular route, not the subcutaneous route used in later trials. The authors concluded that 4 weekly injections were associated with improved stiffness and pain at rest for 20 weeks after treatment stopped.

PubMed

Sodium pentosan polysulfate resulted in cartilage improvement in knee osteoarthritis--an open clinical trial

Kumagai K. et al., BMC Clin Pharmacol 2010;10:7 · 2010 · PMID 20346179

Open-label and uncontrolled, so improvements cannot be separated from placebo effects. The authors concluded that treatment 'seemed to provide' improvements in clinical assessments and the C2C level of cartilage metabolism.

PubMed

Effects of pentosan polysulfate sodium on synovial fluid biomarkers in moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Skerrett D.L. et al., Arthritis Res Ther 2026;28(1):73 · 2026 · PMID 41588475

Biomarker-focused exploratory trial, not an efficacy trial. Several authors are employees and shareholders of the sponsor, Paradigm Biopharmaceuticals, as disclosed in the paper.

PubMed

Calcium pentosan polysulfate directly inhibits enzymatic activity of ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) in osteoarthritic chondrocytes

Takizawa M. et al., FEBS Lett 2008;582(19):2945-2949 · 2008 · PMID 18671975

Cell-culture evidence for one proposed mechanism. It does not show a clinical effect in people.

PubMed

Safety profile

Pentosan polysulfate has a regulatory safety database from its oral interstitial cystitis use, and the main long-term concern in it is retinal. Common adverse reactions. In the unblinded clinical trial of 2499 interstitial cystitis patients described in the FDA label, adverse events at 1 to 4% frequency included alopecia (4%), diarrhoea (4%), nausea (4%), headache (3%), rash (3%), dyspepsia (2%), abdominal pain (2%), liver function abnormalities (1%) and dizziness (1%). The label says alopecia began within the first 4 weeks of treatment and that 97% of alopecia cases were alopecia areata limited to a single area of the scalp. In a 380-patient, 32-week study of 300, 600 and 900 mg daily doses, most adverse events were mild and resolved without intervention (Nickel et al., Urology 2005). The FDA label reports that at 900 mg daily, a dose higher than the approved dose, rectal haemorrhage was reported in 15% of patients in the 380-patient study, and that in a separate 16-week phase 2 study in 100 men (51 PPS, 49 placebo) elevated liver function tests were reported as an adverse event in 11.8% (n=6) of PPS-treated patients versus 2% (n=1) on placebo. Injectable routes. The FDA label for oral Elmiron states: "A similar product that was given subcutaneously, sublingually, or intramuscularly (and not initially metabolized by the liver) is associated with delayed immunoallergic thrombocytopenia with symptoms of thrombosis and hemorrhage." The label does not name that product. Injectable use in knee osteoarthritis. In the 114-patient intramuscular pilot study, mild bruising at the injection site occurred in fewer than 1% of patients in both groups (Ghosh 2005). In the 20-patient open-label subcutaneous study, the dose used affected the blood coagulation tests but was reported to be within safe levels, and slightly abnormal serum triglycerides were noted (Kumagai 2010). The 61-participant phase 2 trial reported that subcutaneous PPS was well tolerated with no serious related adverse events or adverse events of special interest (Skerrett 2026). Pigmentary maculopathy. In a single-centre prospective screening study from UCLA, prevalence among PPS users who agreed to participate was 16% of 100 patients, with mean cumulative dosage of 3,103 g in the affected group versus 768 g in the unaffected group (Wang et al., Am J Ophthalmol 2021). An earlier cross-sectional study from the same centre found 20% (10/50), and its authors recommended annual retinal imaging, especially as cumulative dosage approaches 500 g, and judged that patients exposed to more than 1500 g are at significant risk (Wang et al., Can J Ophthalmol 2020). Both are single-centre cohorts: the 2021 participants agreed to be screened (self-selected), whereas the 2020 patients were randomly ascertained, and neither should be read as a population-wide risk estimate. The 500 g and 1500 g figures come from studies of PPS users that reported daily doses in mg (the Wang 2021 cohort averaged about 290 to 430 mg per day), i.e. oral use; the Fung paper notes that retinal toxicity had primarily been reported following oral administration, so those figures should not be applied to subcutaneous use. A 2026 case series reported pentosan polysulfate maculopathy in three patients after subcutaneous PPS alone for arthritis, at cumulative doses of 45.5 to 96 g over 7 to 10 years; the authors suggest toxicity can occur with subcutaneous administration alone at much lower doses than with oral use, and advise caution when using subcutaneous PPS (Fung et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2026, PMID 41379439). The FDA label states that most reported cases occurred after 3 years of use or longer but that cases have been seen with a shorter duration, and that cumulative dose appears to be a risk factor. Course after stopping. The FDA label states that retinal and vision changes may progress even after cessation of treatment. In an 11-patient retrospective case series, no eyes showed a demonstrable improvement after discontinuing PPS, 9 of 11 patients (82%) reported worsening visual symptoms at the final visit, and the authors suggest that the maculopathy continues to evolve after cessation for at least 10 years (Shah et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2020). Monitoring. The FDA label suggests a baseline retinal examination (including OCT and auto-fluorescence imaging) for all patients within six months of starting treatment and periodically during treatment, and says that if pigmentary changes develop, the risks and benefits of continuing treatment should be re-evaluated because these changes may be irreversible. Symptoms listed in the label are difficulty reading, slow adjustment to low or reduced light environments, and blurred vision.

Reported contraindications & cautions

  • Known hypersensitivity to the drug, structurally related compounds, or excipients (FDA label contraindication).
  • History of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: the FDA label advises caution.
  • Increased bleeding risk: the label advises careful evaluation before starting in patients with aneurysms, thrombocytopenia, haemophilia, gastrointestinal ulcerations, polyps or diverticula, and evaluation for haemorrhage in patients undergoing invasive procedures.
  • Retinal pigment changes from other causes: the label advises caution because findings may confound diagnosis, and recommends a baseline retinal examination in patients with pre-existing ophthalmologic conditions.
  • Injectable routes: the FDA label states that a similar product given subcutaneously, sublingually or intramuscularly (and not initially metabolized by the liver) is associated with delayed immunoallergic thrombocytopenia with symptoms of thrombosis and hemorrhage, and advises caution in patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
  • Pregnancy: the label advises use only if clearly needed, as adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women have not been performed.
  • Hepatic or renal impairment: the label states pharmacokinetics have not been studied in these patients.

Known interactions (FDA label)

  • Coumarin anticoagulants, heparin, t-PA, streptokinase, high-dose aspirin and NSAIDs: the FDA label lists these as other therapies that increase bleeding risk, and advises evaluating such patients for haemorrhage.
  • Warfarin: in a 7-day label study in healthy subjects titrated to an INR of 1.4 to 1.8, warfarin pharmacokinetics and INR were comparable with and without PPS 100 mg every 8 hours. This does not show that PPS is safe alongside anticoagulants in patients; the label still advises evaluating patients on such therapies for haemorrhage.

UK regulatory status

Human use. The MHRA's Drug Safety Update of 19 September 2019 describes pentosan polysulfate as indicated for the treatment of bladder pain syndrome (interstitial cystitis) characterised by either glomerulations or Hunner's lesions in adults with moderate to severe pain, urgency and frequency of micturition, at a recommended 300 mg per day (one 100 mg capsule three times daily), and states that the product information was updated to include the risk of pigmentary maculopathy. The MHRA advised regular ophthalmic examinations for patients taking pentosan polysulfate and asked that suspected adverse reactions be reported to the Yellow Card scheme. The Drug Safety Update's December 2021 note adds that the Summary of Product Characteristics now recommends an ophthalmologic examination after 6 months of use and, if there are no pathologic findings, regularly after 5 years of use. This page does not confirm whether a UK-licensed product is currently on the market: the MHRA product database could not be queried programmatically and the emc search returned no pentosan results on 15 October 2026. Check the MHRA products database before relying on current availability. Knee osteoarthritis. The indication described by the MHRA and by the FDA label is interstitial cystitis bladder pain. The injectable PPS used in the knee osteoarthritis trials discussed on this page was studied as an investigational treatment; we did not find a regulatory approval for it in that indication. Veterinary use. Cartrophen Vet (100 mg sodium pentosan polysulphate per ml) was the subject of adverse-reaction reports to the UK Veterinary Medicines Directorate in dogs between 1991 and 1999 (Hannon et al., 2003). We did not check its current veterinary authorisation, and a veterinary product is not a human medicine. This site does not sell pentosan polysulfate. Nothing here is medical advice; anyone taking it, or considering it, should speak to a prescriber and an eye-care professional.

Frequently asked questions

Is pentosan polysulfate available in the UK for humans?
The MHRA's Drug Safety Update of September 2019 describes pentosan polysulfate (Elmiron) as indicated in adults for bladder pain syndrome (interstitial cystitis) with moderate to severe pain, urgency and frequency, at 300 mg per day, and says the UK product information was updated for the risk of pigmentary maculopathy. This page could not confirm whether a UK-licensed product is currently on the market, so check the MHRA products database. The injectable PPS used in knee osteoarthritis trials is an investigational treatment, and this site does not supply it.
What is pentosan polysulfate maculopathy and how serious is it?
It is a pigmentary maculopathy first described in 2018 by Pearce and colleagues in six interstitial cystitis patients who had taken PPS for years (median cumulative exposure 2263 g). Two UCLA screening studies of PPS users found it in 20% (10 of 50) and 16% (of 100 who agreed to be screened); those are single-centre groups (the 16% figure comes from volunteers), not population-wide rates, and they involved oral users rather than subcutaneous use. A 2026 case series reported the maculopathy in three patients after subcutaneous PPS alone for arthritis, at cumulative doses of only 45.5 to 96 g over 7 to 10 years, and its authors advise caution with subcutaneous PPS (Fung 2026). The FDA label says cumulative dose appears to be a risk factor and that changes may progress even after treatment stops. In an 11-patient series, no eyes improved after stopping and 9 of 11 patients reported worsening vision symptoms. The label lists difficulty reading, slow adjustment to low light and blurred vision as symptoms, and suggests a baseline retinal examination within six months of starting treatment and periodic examinations afterwards.
Does PPS have anticoagulant effects that matter?
Yes. The FDA label calls Elmiron a weak anticoagulant (1/15 the activity of heparin) and warns that the effect may increase bleeding times. At 300 mg per day, rectal haemorrhage was reported in 6.3% of 128 patients in one study, and the label lists ecchymosis, epistaxis and gum haemorrhage. It advises evaluating patients with an increased bleeding risk, including those taking coumarin anticoagulants, heparin, t-PA, streptokinase, high-dose aspirin or NSAIDs, and caution in anyone with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In a 7-day label study in healthy volunteers titrated to an INR of 1.4 to 1.8, warfarin pharmacokinetics and INR were comparable with and without PPS 100 mg every 8 hours; that does not show it is safe alongside anticoagulants in patients. The label also states: "A similar product that was given subcutaneously, sublingually, or intramuscularly (and not initially metabolized by the liver) is associated with delayed immunoallergic thrombocytopenia with symptoms of thrombosis and hemorrhage."
Is pentosan polysulfate a peptide?
No. The FDA label describes it as a semi-synthetically produced heparin-like macromolecular carbohydrate derivative with a molecular weight of 4000 to 6000 Dalton, and a 2010 clinical paper says it is manufactured from beech-wood hemicellulose by sulfate esterification of the xylopyranose hydroxyl groups. It is a sulfated polysaccharide, so it is listed here as a related compound to the healing peptides rather than as a peptide itself.
What do human knee osteoarthritis trials of PPS show?
The published human data are small. A 114-patient randomised pilot study using weekly intramuscular PPS for 4 weeks reported improved stiffness duration, pain at rest and patient global assessment versus control (Ghosh 2005). A 20-patient open-label study using 6 weekly subcutaneous injections reported clinical improvements for almost a year but had no control group (Kumagai 2010). A 61-participant exploratory phase 2 trial reported changes in synovial fluid biomarkers, including a lower cartilage-degradation marker ARGS versus placebo, higher serum CTX-I than placebo (+35.74% at Day 56, p = 0.022; +65.52% at Day 168, p = 0.025), and no serious related adverse events (Skerrett 2026). A larger phase 2/3 trial, NCT04809376, is listed as active, not recruiting, and we did not find a published result for it.
Should the eyes be monitored in people taking PPS?
The FDA label suggests a baseline retinal examination (including OCT and auto-fluorescence imaging) for all patients within six months of starting treatment and periodically during treatment. The MHRA advised regular ophthalmic examinations in 2019, and its December 2021 note says the UK Summary of Product Characteristics recommends an examination after 6 months of use and, if there are no pathologic findings, regularly after 5 years of use or earlier in case of visual complaints. The MHRA also asks for suspected adverse reactions to be reported to the Yellow Card scheme.
Is PPS effective for interstitial cystitis?
Controlled data show a modest benefit. In the 148-patient trial by Parsons and colleagues (1993), 32% of patients taking PPS 100 mg three times daily showed significant improvement versus 16% on placebo (p = 0.01). A later 380-patient dose-ranging study found symptom scores improved at 300, 600 and 900 mg per day with no difference between doses, and no placebo arm (Nickel 2005). The FDA label reports that at 900 mg per day, a dose higher than the approved dose, rectal haemorrhage was reported in 15% of patients in that study and elevated liver function tests in 11.8% of PPS-treated men versus 2% on placebo in a separate 16-week phase 2 study. The FDA label states that the mechanism in interstitial cystitis is unknown and that patients should be reassessed after 3 months.

References

  1. Pigmentary Maculopathy Associated with Chronic Exposure to Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium. Pearce W.A., Chen R., Jain N., Ophthalmology 2018;125(11):1793-1802 (2018). PMID 29801663
  2. Pentosan Polysulfate Maculopathy: Prevalence, Spectrum of Disease, and Choroidal Imaging Analysis Based on Prospective Screening. Wang D. et al., Am J Ophthalmol 2021;227:125-138 (2021). PMID 33651989
  3. Pentosan-associated maculopathy: prevalence, screening guidelines, and spectrum of findings based on prospective multimodal analysis. Wang D. et al., Can J Ophthalmol 2020;55(2):116-125 (2020). PMID 31973791
  4. Pentosan Polysulfate Maculopathy Following Subcutaneous Injections for Arthritis. Fung A.T. et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2026;144(2):185-191 (2026). PMID 41379439
  5. Disease Course in Patients With Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium-Associated Maculopathy After Drug Cessation. Shah R. et al., JAMA Ophthalmol 2020;138(8):894-900 (2020). PMID 32644147
  6. A quantitatively controlled method to study prospectively interstitial cystitis and demonstrate the efficacy of pentosanpolysulfate. Parsons C.L., Benson G., Childs S.J., Hanno P., Sant G.R., Webster G., J Urol 1993;150(3):845-848 (1993). PMID 7688432
  7. Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of pentosan polysulfate sodium for interstitial cystitis. Nickel J.C. et al., Urology 2005;65(4):654-658 (2005). PMID 15833501
  8. Effects of pentosan polysulfate in osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Ghosh P., Edelman J., March L., Smith M., Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2005;66(6):552-571 (2005). PMID 24678076
  9. Sodium pentosan polysulfate resulted in cartilage improvement in knee osteoarthritis--an open clinical trial. Kumagai K. et al., BMC Clin Pharmacol 2010;10:7 (2010). PMID 20346179
  10. Effects of pentosan polysulfate sodium on synovial fluid biomarkers in moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Skerrett D.L. et al., Arthritis Res Ther 2026;28(1):73 (2026). PMID 41588475
  11. Calcium pentosan polysulfate directly inhibits enzymatic activity of ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) in osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Takizawa M. et al., FEBS Lett 2008;582(19):2945-2949 (2008). PMID 18671975
  12. Elmiron (pentosan polysulfate sodium) FDA prescribing information, revised June 2020 (Drugs@FDA)
  13. Elmiron current label (DailyMed)
  14. MHRA Drug Safety Update: Elmiron (pentosan polysulfate sodium): rare risk of pigmentary maculopathy
  15. Hannon et al. 2003: Safety of Cartrophen Vet in the dog: review of adverse reaction reports in the UK (PMID 12779171)
  16. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04809376: subcutaneous PPS versus placebo in knee OA pain
  17. PubMed search: pentosan polysulfate

Cited in research summaries

Related peptides